Home        |        Statutory Updates        |        State Holidays        |        Seminars        |        Product Training
  www.incspot.com     |     Contact Us     |     Archive MARCH / APRIL 2007

Using a Multi-Faceted Virtual IP Deal Room in an M&A Transaction

In any acquisition or merger transaction, conducting due diligence on a target company’s patent portfolio is critical. In some cases, a company’s patent portfolio is its most valuable asset. In performing due diligence, legal counsel is required to carefully review the target company’s patent case files. The review typically focuses on three areas:

(i) Ownership of the patents: are there any ownership concerns? Are there any licensees? Have the proper assignments been filed?
(ii) The strength of the claims: are there any prosecution history estoppel issues? Have any infringement claims been filed by third parties?
(iii) Expiration issues: have the patent maintenance fees been paid?

Legal counsel will need to review thousands of pages in order to complete a proper review covering these and other potential issues. In M&A transactions where the target company has several thousand pending and issued patents in paper files, this can be a daunting task. To complicate matters, many of these deals need to be completed in a short time frame, which adds additional pressure to legal counsel. Moreover, after the transaction is completed, patent case files need to be seamlessly integrated into the acquiring company’s document management system. New technology in the form of patent-centric virtual Intellectual Property Deal Rooms (IPDR’s) that can also extract data from traditional document management systems are now available to assist companies to make the due diligence and document integration process more efficient and effective for legal counsel.

Traditional Paper Intensive Practice
Traditionally, in an M&A transaction, legal counsel of the target company make their patent paper case files available to counsel for the acquiring company. In many cases, the acquiring company’s legal counsel will also request file wrappers from the USPTO to insure it has obtained all pertinent documents for review. Due to the time and resource constraints, the documents are typically made available in hard copy at the target company’s place of business or, if outside counsel is prosecuting the cases, at the place of business of the target company’s outside counsel.

There are several challenges with this paper-based approach: first, it can be costly and burdensome for a target company to provide access to its files at it company location. In a typical merger, the patent cases that are being transferred in the merger must be properly segregated from the patent cases that are not being transferred. This will take significant time and effort by administrators and attorneys, especially in transactions where hundreds or thousands of cases are involved. Second, having third party counsel in your offices may create the potential for a loss of trade secrets should information be accidentally disclosed while the attorneys of the potential acquirer or merger candidate are in the target company’s offices. Third, once the deal is consummated, the paper patent case files need to be integrated into the acquiring company’s document management workflow process. This can be particularly cumbersome if the patent cases are paper files that are simply shipped to the acquiring company in hundreds of boxes, along with thousands of other non-patent paper files that can result in a post-acquisition logistical nightmare of lost or misplaced patent files and potentially compromised intellectual property rights.

IPDR Digital Approach
Today, acquiring companies are insisting that target companies use an IPDR system to provide greater efficiencies and transparency into the patent portfolio of the target Company and enable electronic review to comply with due diligence duties. With respect to intellectual property assets such as patents, an IPDR system that is patent-centric provides specific patent workflows and features to better assist patent administrators and lawyers in performing their due diligence and document integration work as follows:

Workflows and Features
The essential feature of the IPDR system is a tri-fold view of each of the patent case files in the target company’s patent portfolio. The digital patent tri-fold view mimics the traditional paper copy files. The left side of the tri-fold contains the patent correspondence, the middle section contains the file history and the right side contains the document section. These case files can be populated with pertinent data from several sources including:

(i) Direct import of electronic documents, files or other data from existing document management systems;
(ii) Direct import of data from the USPTO’s or other on-line systems that have patent download capabilities;
(iii) Scanning of files directly into the IPDR system. The scanning and document breakout for several thousand patents can be typically done in a few days. Given the numerous outsourcing vendors and commoditization of these services, the attendant fees are extremely competitive.

A patent-centric IPDR system will enable an acquiring company’s patent counsel with a particular expertise to participate in the due diligence process from a remote location by accessing the application and viewing the pertinent patent case files in the familiar tri-fold view. Furthermore, the system should integrate with the USPTO database allowing the legal counsel to quickly evaluate the official status of the patent cases being reviewed and verify that all the pertinent patents are being reviewed. An IPDR also permits various roles and permissions, such as read-only or read-write access, to be granted on a case-by-case basis to authorized in-house or outside counsel. The system should also provide a work activity feature that enables the target company to track what actions are being performed in the application by attorneys or administrators that are conducting the due diligence review. Other features that are important to an IPDR system are: quick uploading/data population features such as drag and drop, secure access functionalities, and full text search capabilities, coupled with document commenting, editing and collaboration through the entire process.

A Win-Win: Using an IPDR system to integrate documents between different document management systems
A recent example illustrates how an IPDR system can be a win-win for both an acquiring and target company. It is exemplified in a recent acquisition between two large pharmaceutical companies.

Company A (Acquirer) desired to expedite the integration of Company B’s (Target) patent portfolio which consisted of several thousand patent case files into its document management system, which was a different system than that of Company B. However because the deal was awaiting federal regulatory approval the patent documents needed to be staged on a separate secure server and not integrated into Company A’s document management system until approval was granted. In addition, the patent documents needed to be broken out, mapped and prepared for integration into Company A’s document management system on the day regulatory approval was granted. Company B desired to retain control of the patent documents should federal approval of the acquisition be denied.

In this case, Company B had an electronic document management system in which all of its patent documents were contained in electronic format. This allowed Company B to quickly retrieve all of its patent case files and provide them to Company A in a digital format. A neutral third party vendor was hired to “stage” all of Company B’s patent cases in a secure IPDR system. Access to the system was granted only to Company B’s legal counsel and agents pending regulatory approvals. All of the patent documents were broken out and uploaded into the tri-fold view case file format of the IPDR system. All of the patent cases and documents were then mapped to Company A’s existing document management system. A bulk uploading module was used to upload the patent documents into Company A’s document management system.

How did this benefit the parties? Immediately upon receiving governmental approval, all of the patent cases were seamlessly loaded into Company A’s document management system allowing Company A’s legal counsel to immediately view and manage the new patent cases on its own system. Company A realized an immediate return by using the IPDR system to seamlessly integrate all of the new patent cases into its workflow process, saving significant expense and eliminating the risk of compromised IP rights. By having all of their patent case files already digitized and staged on a neutral third party site, Company B saved the time and significant expense of: segregating and/or copying the pertinent patent case files, making them available to potential acquirers in a secure location, and extending the length and cost of the due diligence process.

Summary
In today’s innovation economy, intellectual property rights can take center stage in an acquisition. Global offices and remote workers demand a digital solution in the due diligence arena, enabling rapid communication and collaboration on mergers and acquisitions. A patent-centric solution addresses these demands, and also provides a neutral third-party patent document management system prior to closing. And for the acquiring company, using an IPDR for an acquisition enables the patent counsel to meet due diligence duties, minimize the transition period and seamlessly integrate patent case files from disparate document management systems, post closing.

To learn more about IPDR systems, send us an email at switch@cscinfo.com, or call 800-927-9800.

Click here to view printable version

Registered Agent  |  Compliance & Governance  |  Litigation & Matter Management  |  Corporate Legal Services
UCC & Motor Vehicle Services  |  Intellectual Property Management  |  Trust & Financial Services  |  Publications

Corporation Service Company®  •  2711 Centerville Road  •  Wilmington, DE 19808  •  800-927-9800

CSCFlash™ is not intended to provide legal or professional advice. If such advice is required, you should seek the services of an attorney or other professional. CSC cannot guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the information in CSCFlash.